On ABC this morning, Cutter was asked about the endorsement of Romney by the Des Moines Register. This was the first time since 1972 that the Register endorsed the Republican candidate for president. Here is what Cutter had to say, in part,
CUTTER: Well, you know, they endorsed Mitt Romney in the primary, so this was not much of a surprise. It was a little surprising to read that editorial, because it didn't seem to be based at all in reality, not just in the president's record, but in Mitt Romney's record. It says that he'd reach across the aisle, which he'd do the exact opposite. It's the exact opposite of what he did in Massachusetts.
So there you have it. Cutter is telling America that in Massachusetts, Romney as governor did not reach across the aisle to Democrats. Huh? The Massachusetts legislature was 85% Democrats when Romney was governor. Obviously, Romney worked with the Democrats. Had he not done so, he could not have gotten anything passed. He would have had no budget. He would have had no expenditures. He could not have made any appointments. Well, someone needs to explain to Cutter that Romney did pass laws; he did have budgets (which by the way were balanced); he did get his appointments approved. Cutter is obviously just making it up as she goes along. Shame on you Stephanie Cutter.
No comments:
Post a Comment