Professor Pamela Karlan of Stanford law school "testifies" today before the impeachment circus...er, committee. She is supposedly there to give her opinions on the propriety of impeachment and the like. She's made clear, however, that she hates President Trump with a passion, indeed an unreasonable crazy hatred that seems all consuming. Why would anyone listen to her.
Consider this.
1. Karlan is already on video tape telling an audience that when she walked down the street near the Trump DC Hotel, she had to cross to the other side of the street before passing by. She couldn't deal with even the thought of being on the property of the Trump hotel. That's rather neurotic to say the least. Many would classify that as a psychosis rather than a neurosis.
2. This morning while testifying Karlan thought it appropriate to take a shot at the President's 13 year old son Barron. She criticized his name. I'm not kidding. It was like Middle School on steroids. What kind of an adult makes fun of the name of a young teen? Even worse, what sort of a supposedly respectable law professor bullies a boy on the basis of his name? Just imagine the reaction if President Trump did exactly the same thing to the son or daughter of Karlan.
(To be fair, I have no idea if Karlan has children.)
There is no excuse for having a rabid anti-Trump professor who bullies children testify. The Dems are losing what little credibility they had. (Okay, they didn't have any, but still this is a new low even for them.)
UPDATE
The First Lady felt the need to respond to Karlan and her unprovoked attack on Barron. Here's her tweet:
Consider this.
1. Karlan is already on video tape telling an audience that when she walked down the street near the Trump DC Hotel, she had to cross to the other side of the street before passing by. She couldn't deal with even the thought of being on the property of the Trump hotel. That's rather neurotic to say the least. Many would classify that as a psychosis rather than a neurosis.
2. This morning while testifying Karlan thought it appropriate to take a shot at the President's 13 year old son Barron. She criticized his name. I'm not kidding. It was like Middle School on steroids. What kind of an adult makes fun of the name of a young teen? Even worse, what sort of a supposedly respectable law professor bullies a boy on the basis of his name? Just imagine the reaction if President Trump did exactly the same thing to the son or daughter of Karlan.
(To be fair, I have no idea if Karlan has children.)
There is no excuse for having a rabid anti-Trump professor who bullies children testify. The Dems are losing what little credibility they had. (Okay, they didn't have any, but still this is a new low even for them.)
UPDATE
The First Lady felt the need to respond to Karlan and her unprovoked attack on Barron. Here's her tweet:
·
A minor child deserves privacy and should be kept out of politics. Pamela Karlan, you should be ashamed of your very angry and obviously biased public pandering, and using a child to do it.
GOOD FOR MELANIA.
No comments:
Post a Comment