It never ceases to amaze me. Something happens and the reporters/pundits on TV immediately explain what is happening without having a clue as to the true facts. And it just keeps getting worse.
I say that after watching some of the coverage today of the departure of Steve Bannon from the White House. In the space of one half hour, I was told by those on the TV that Bannon was fired, that he had quite some weeks ago and that Bannon always intended to leave around Labor Day. Next these geniuses of the airwaves told me that Bannon was about to start shooting at those in the White House who he did not like but not at the president, that Bannon was going to war with Trump himself, that Bannon would be an independent actor outside the White House attacking the President's enemies and that Bannon would be outside the White House but would still be a main adviser to the President. When that ended, I heard that Bannon was an anti-Semite, a white supremacist, and a bigot. Then I heard that he was a long time friend/supporter of Israel and not an anti-Semite. Then someone said he had gotten a bad rap on the white supremacist story.
I guess the best way to describe the coverage right now is that it is changing by the hour and it depends on which station you watch. On MSNBC, Bannon is a sinister figure. On CNN, Bannon is the only person with a brain in the White House and his departure will leave Trump helpless. On Fox, they do not seem sure how to describe Bannon. The only similarity on each network is that the person reporting always acts as if he or she knows the inside story. Clearly, most of these reporters are just revealing themselves to be morons.
I think that because it may be an insult to morons everywhere to call the media people by that name we need to come up with a new description that shows that these are a different kind of moron. From now on, we should call the media the "alt-morons".
I say that after watching some of the coverage today of the departure of Steve Bannon from the White House. In the space of one half hour, I was told by those on the TV that Bannon was fired, that he had quite some weeks ago and that Bannon always intended to leave around Labor Day. Next these geniuses of the airwaves told me that Bannon was about to start shooting at those in the White House who he did not like but not at the president, that Bannon was going to war with Trump himself, that Bannon would be an independent actor outside the White House attacking the President's enemies and that Bannon would be outside the White House but would still be a main adviser to the President. When that ended, I heard that Bannon was an anti-Semite, a white supremacist, and a bigot. Then I heard that he was a long time friend/supporter of Israel and not an anti-Semite. Then someone said he had gotten a bad rap on the white supremacist story.
I guess the best way to describe the coverage right now is that it is changing by the hour and it depends on which station you watch. On MSNBC, Bannon is a sinister figure. On CNN, Bannon is the only person with a brain in the White House and his departure will leave Trump helpless. On Fox, they do not seem sure how to describe Bannon. The only similarity on each network is that the person reporting always acts as if he or she knows the inside story. Clearly, most of these reporters are just revealing themselves to be morons.
I think that because it may be an insult to morons everywhere to call the media people by that name we need to come up with a new description that shows that these are a different kind of moron. From now on, we should call the media the "alt-morons".
No comments:
Post a Comment