With the disclosure that the Obama FBI and CIA were spying on the Trump campaign in 2016, there are a few important questions that will need to be answered before final conclusions can be reached. Here are just a few of the important ones:
1. We now know that in the spring of 2016, there was a meeting of the National Security Council in the White House which was attended by president Obama and all the senior security officials. At that meeting, there was a briefing of those present as to the possibility that the Russians were trying to infiltrate the Trump campaign. According to people like then DNI Clapper and CIA director Brennan, it was after this meeting that the spies were placed into the Trump campaign to protect Trump from the Russians and not to spy on him. It sounds ridiculous, but it gives rise to a very major question. If president Obama and the NSC thought that the Russians might be trying to infiltrate the Trump campaign, why didn't they tell Donald Trump? Seriously, if one of the two major candidates for president was under assault by foreign agents, why didn't the Obamacrats warn him?
The most likely answer is the simplest one, namely, that the Obamacrats were trying to entrap Trump, not to protect him. They wanted to get whatever dirt they could on Trump so that they could use it later in the campaign. Russians actually had very little, if anything, to do with the entire matter.
2. Jim Comey has twice said that he did not tell then president-elect Trump that the Trump Dossier had been created at the behest of the DNC and the Clinton campaign at a cost of over $13 million dollars because "it was not part of [his] assignment." What assignment, and who gave it to him? Was it DNI Clapper? Who else knew about the assignment?
These are not idle questions. We know that as soon as Comey left his meeting with Trump in January of 2017, he called Clapper to report on the meeting. Comey then spoke to CNN which followed up by reporting a story that Trump had been briefed about the Dossier. That CNN story broke 3 or 4 days later. During those 3 days, however, Andrew McCabe who was then the number 2 guy in the FBI sent emails to deputy attorney general Sally Yates and others warning them that the story was about to break on CNN. That means that he knew about Comey's meeting and what was said there. How big was the cabal that decided to plant the story with CNN?
3. Is there even one piece of evidence that was not manufactured by the CIA or FBI or other Obamacrats that points to collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign? And how many attempts can we find which show that the Obamacrats tried to "create" phony evidence.
It's like that Dan Rather story during the 2004 campaign that relied on fraudulent documents. After the fraud came out and Rather was disgraced, he still called the story something like "fake but accurate". Is the entire Russia-Trump investigation built on the basis of planted evidence put in place by the Obamacrats?
1. We now know that in the spring of 2016, there was a meeting of the National Security Council in the White House which was attended by president Obama and all the senior security officials. At that meeting, there was a briefing of those present as to the possibility that the Russians were trying to infiltrate the Trump campaign. According to people like then DNI Clapper and CIA director Brennan, it was after this meeting that the spies were placed into the Trump campaign to protect Trump from the Russians and not to spy on him. It sounds ridiculous, but it gives rise to a very major question. If president Obama and the NSC thought that the Russians might be trying to infiltrate the Trump campaign, why didn't they tell Donald Trump? Seriously, if one of the two major candidates for president was under assault by foreign agents, why didn't the Obamacrats warn him?
The most likely answer is the simplest one, namely, that the Obamacrats were trying to entrap Trump, not to protect him. They wanted to get whatever dirt they could on Trump so that they could use it later in the campaign. Russians actually had very little, if anything, to do with the entire matter.
2. Jim Comey has twice said that he did not tell then president-elect Trump that the Trump Dossier had been created at the behest of the DNC and the Clinton campaign at a cost of over $13 million dollars because "it was not part of [his] assignment." What assignment, and who gave it to him? Was it DNI Clapper? Who else knew about the assignment?
These are not idle questions. We know that as soon as Comey left his meeting with Trump in January of 2017, he called Clapper to report on the meeting. Comey then spoke to CNN which followed up by reporting a story that Trump had been briefed about the Dossier. That CNN story broke 3 or 4 days later. During those 3 days, however, Andrew McCabe who was then the number 2 guy in the FBI sent emails to deputy attorney general Sally Yates and others warning them that the story was about to break on CNN. That means that he knew about Comey's meeting and what was said there. How big was the cabal that decided to plant the story with CNN?
3. Is there even one piece of evidence that was not manufactured by the CIA or FBI or other Obamacrats that points to collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign? And how many attempts can we find which show that the Obamacrats tried to "create" phony evidence.
It's like that Dan Rather story during the 2004 campaign that relied on fraudulent documents. After the fraud came out and Rather was disgraced, he still called the story something like "fake but accurate". Is the entire Russia-Trump investigation built on the basis of planted evidence put in place by the Obamacrats?
No comments:
Post a Comment