It's hard to comprehend sometimes the absolutely delusional outlook of Hillary Clinton. Lately, Hillary has made clear that she blames Bernie Sanders for running a negative campaign, something that Sanders said he would not do. The problem, of course, is that Sanders is not going negative; he's just contrasting his positions with Hillary's and stating the truth. Only in Clinton World would that sort of campaign be called negative. Sure, Bernie is criticizing Hillary's positions and actions, but that's not a negative campaign. When Trump called Marco Rubio "Little Marco", that was negative. When Trump calls Cruz "Lyin Ted", that's negative. When Bernie says that Hillary took millions of dollars from Wall Street for a few speeches and that he would not do that, it's just the truth.
Yesterday, a woman at a campaign event for Hillary asked her if she would stop taking cash from the big oil companies. Hillary's response was to get angry and snap that she was tired of the Sanders' campaign "spreading lies" about her. But it's not a lie. Take a look at the list of donors who gave millions to the Clinton Foundation. Even Hillary then did a typical Clinton move. She said that she did not take cash from oil companies but only from employees of oil companies. So if the CEO of EXXON gives Hillary $250,000 for her SuperPAC, she thinks that's not taking cash from big oil. Yeah, right!
Also yesterday, Clinton anonymous spokesmen complained that someone who spoke at a Sanders rally in New York mentioned that Hillary was facing an upcoming interview by the FBI in the criminal investigation of he conduct regarding emails. Somehow, that's negative campaigning. No, it's actually just the truth. Hillary is on the road to being indicted. Again, that's not negative; it's the truth.
Can we really afford another delusional president?
Yesterday, a woman at a campaign event for Hillary asked her if she would stop taking cash from the big oil companies. Hillary's response was to get angry and snap that she was tired of the Sanders' campaign "spreading lies" about her. But it's not a lie. Take a look at the list of donors who gave millions to the Clinton Foundation. Even Hillary then did a typical Clinton move. She said that she did not take cash from oil companies but only from employees of oil companies. So if the CEO of EXXON gives Hillary $250,000 for her SuperPAC, she thinks that's not taking cash from big oil. Yeah, right!
Also yesterday, Clinton anonymous spokesmen complained that someone who spoke at a Sanders rally in New York mentioned that Hillary was facing an upcoming interview by the FBI in the criminal investigation of he conduct regarding emails. Somehow, that's negative campaigning. No, it's actually just the truth. Hillary is on the road to being indicted. Again, that's not negative; it's the truth.
Can we really afford another delusional president?
No comments:
Post a Comment