The current news is focused on President Trump, but the center is actually the corruption of Old Joe Biden when he was vice president. Because Biden is a Democrat, the media pays his misdeeds very little attention, but it is worth noting that there are three things that Biden did for which there is just no explanation other than corruption.
The first deals with Biden's son Hunter. Hunter has led a troubled life. In short order, he was discharged from the military for drug use, had an affair with his sister-in-law which then led to his divorce, broke up with the sister-in-law and married another woman who he had known for less than two weeks. He also got involved with big business. Hunter formed a hedge fund investing in energy companies in partnership with the son of former Secretary of State John Kerry and the son of notorious mobster criminal. This threesome managed to get an investment from a company owned by China. The investment totaled 1.5 billion dollars. Of course, none of the three partners had any experience in this or any other sort of hedge fund. Why did China put 1.5 billion dollars into their hands? The Chinese are not known to invest with other hedge funds, so why did China pick these novices as the recipients of such a huge investment.
The answer may lie in the fact that then vice president Biden flew with his son Hunter to Beijing on Air Force Two for the meeting where Hunter Biden finalized the investment by the Chinese. No doubt, China thought it was buying influence with Joe Biden by investing such a huge amount with his son. Surely, Joe Biden knew what was happening and he was fine with the Chinese buying his good will.
The second also deals with Hunter. The private Ukrainian company Burisma hired Hunter to be a director. The company is mainly in the natural gas business. When put on the board of directors, Hunter had no experience as a direct of any other company. He had no experience in the natural gas industry. He also did not speak Ukrainian. All he had was his connection to his father. For this, Hunter got paid roughly $600,000 per year.
But it gets worse. Burisma was being investigated by the Ukrainian State Prosecutor. Biden was put in charge of Ukrainian - American relations by then president Obama. Biden has boasted that he got the Ukrainian prosecutor fired by threatening the then president of the Ukraine that American aid would be cut off unless the prosecutor were fired in the next six hours. The Ukrainians yielded and the prosecutor was fired. In other words, Biden used his office to protect his son and insure his continued lucrative job with Burisma.
The third deals with Biden's brother. In 2010, Obama had put Biden in charge of dealing with Iraqi reconstruction and other things. Biden's brother suddenly was named executive vice president of a large construction company even though he had no experience in construction or in senior management of a corporation. In a "coincidence", just about a month after Old Joe's brother got the job, the construction company got a contract for 1.5 billion dollars from the federal government to rebuild housing in Iraq. No doubt Old Joe says there was no connection, but does he really expect people to believe that?
Here's the problem. If there were only one instance like this, it could be called a strange coincidence. Two of these are essentially impossible to be just a coincidence with no corruption. But three of them? This is clear proof that Old Joe Biden is corrupt and used his office to send millions of bucks to his family members. This is beyond dispute.
At the moment, the Democrats and the media are going berserk and seeking to impeach the President for a phone call where he said nothing improper. They want to read an implication into Trump's words that supposedly threatened the president of Ukraine even though nothing of the sort was said and the Ukrainian president confirms that he felt no pressure. It would be impeachment without any wrongdoing. On the other hand, we have Biden for whom there is clear evidence of wrongdoing, namely corrupt behavior. The Dems and the media don't even want to talk about this. That's crazy.
Biden's corruption means he cannot be president or even the Democrat nominee. The Dems/media won't discuss this in public, but the conclusion is one that cannot be avoided.
The first deals with Biden's son Hunter. Hunter has led a troubled life. In short order, he was discharged from the military for drug use, had an affair with his sister-in-law which then led to his divorce, broke up with the sister-in-law and married another woman who he had known for less than two weeks. He also got involved with big business. Hunter formed a hedge fund investing in energy companies in partnership with the son of former Secretary of State John Kerry and the son of notorious mobster criminal. This threesome managed to get an investment from a company owned by China. The investment totaled 1.5 billion dollars. Of course, none of the three partners had any experience in this or any other sort of hedge fund. Why did China put 1.5 billion dollars into their hands? The Chinese are not known to invest with other hedge funds, so why did China pick these novices as the recipients of such a huge investment.
The answer may lie in the fact that then vice president Biden flew with his son Hunter to Beijing on Air Force Two for the meeting where Hunter Biden finalized the investment by the Chinese. No doubt, China thought it was buying influence with Joe Biden by investing such a huge amount with his son. Surely, Joe Biden knew what was happening and he was fine with the Chinese buying his good will.
The second also deals with Hunter. The private Ukrainian company Burisma hired Hunter to be a director. The company is mainly in the natural gas business. When put on the board of directors, Hunter had no experience as a direct of any other company. He had no experience in the natural gas industry. He also did not speak Ukrainian. All he had was his connection to his father. For this, Hunter got paid roughly $600,000 per year.
But it gets worse. Burisma was being investigated by the Ukrainian State Prosecutor. Biden was put in charge of Ukrainian - American relations by then president Obama. Biden has boasted that he got the Ukrainian prosecutor fired by threatening the then president of the Ukraine that American aid would be cut off unless the prosecutor were fired in the next six hours. The Ukrainians yielded and the prosecutor was fired. In other words, Biden used his office to protect his son and insure his continued lucrative job with Burisma.
The third deals with Biden's brother. In 2010, Obama had put Biden in charge of dealing with Iraqi reconstruction and other things. Biden's brother suddenly was named executive vice president of a large construction company even though he had no experience in construction or in senior management of a corporation. In a "coincidence", just about a month after Old Joe's brother got the job, the construction company got a contract for 1.5 billion dollars from the federal government to rebuild housing in Iraq. No doubt Old Joe says there was no connection, but does he really expect people to believe that?
Here's the problem. If there were only one instance like this, it could be called a strange coincidence. Two of these are essentially impossible to be just a coincidence with no corruption. But three of them? This is clear proof that Old Joe Biden is corrupt and used his office to send millions of bucks to his family members. This is beyond dispute.
At the moment, the Democrats and the media are going berserk and seeking to impeach the President for a phone call where he said nothing improper. They want to read an implication into Trump's words that supposedly threatened the president of Ukraine even though nothing of the sort was said and the Ukrainian president confirms that he felt no pressure. It would be impeachment without any wrongdoing. On the other hand, we have Biden for whom there is clear evidence of wrongdoing, namely corrupt behavior. The Dems and the media don't even want to talk about this. That's crazy.
Biden's corruption means he cannot be president or even the Democrat nominee. The Dems/media won't discuss this in public, but the conclusion is one that cannot be avoided.
No comments:
Post a Comment