Too Much Even For The Mainstream Media

The hit piece by Ronan Farrow in the New Yorker in which Deborah Ramirez accuses Judge Kavanaugh of exposing himself to her at a drunken party when they were freshmen at Yale is under fire from the mainstream media.  Wow!  An article designed to torpedo the Kavanaugh nomination is actually drawing fire from the New York Times and a mega-Democrat on ABC.

When the story dropped in the New Yorker, the Times reported on it, but in the middle of the article it said this:

The Times had interviewed several dozen people over the past week in an attempt to corroborate her story, and could find no one with firsthand knowledge. Ms. Ramirez herself contacted former Yale classmates asking if they recalled the incident and told some of them that she could not be certain Mr. Kavanaugh was the one who exposed himself.

 

Think about that.  The NY Times itself couldn't stand the idea of reporting a story which no one could back up and about which the complaining woman herself wasn't sure.  Maybe there is some journalistic instinct left at the Times.

 

That was followed by ABC where former Clinton staffer George Stephanopoulos interviewed Ronan Farrow on Good Morning America this morning.  Stephanopoulos challenged Ronan Farrow about the lack of witnesses.  Farrow admitted he had no eyewitnesses but claimed that some people who knew Kavanaugh at Yale said it was “possible.”

 

There you have it.  Ramirez says she was totally drunk and admitted that she wasn't sure if the guy involved was Kavanaugh.  No one -- that's right no one -- backs up her story by saying that they were there and saw this happen.  Some people, on the other hand, say they were there but Kavanaugh did not do what Ramirez claims.  And even ABC News and a mega-Democrat couldn't let this smear soil Kavanaugh's reputation like this.

 

The Senate Judiciary Committee should just cancel all the hearings and vote today to confirm Kavanaugh.  He has been through enough.