The New York Times was back at its main mission today: misleading millions of Americans. Let me ask you this: what, if anything, is wrong with a headline at the top of the front page of today's edition of the Times that says "Moderate Leading in Iranian Vote"? And, for those of you who think that the media do not use the same talking points, how about a report highlighted on Yahoo News that a "reformist" is leading in the Iranian vote.
Are they kidding? There were eight candidates for president in Iran. Each one had to be approved in advance by the Ayatollah. Each one passed muster specifically because he was not a moderate or a reformist. Those men were rejected by the Ayatollah. Anyone who would call a presidential candidate on the ballot in Iran a moderate or a reformist is either an idiot or a propagandist.
If one wanted to get America used to the idea that we will not take steps to stop the Iranian nuclear program after years and years of saying that we would, what better way is there than to convince Americans that Iran is moderating. If Iran is reforming, do we really need to destroy that nation's nuclear capabilities? Of course not!
That, my friends, is why these media propagandists for the administration are reporting nonsense.
When the first post nuclear crisis with Iran erupts -- and it will -- no one will remember what the Times and Yahoo published today. Sadly, though, on that day, millions will be in the cross hairs of nuclear destruction, and they will all wonder why we never did anything to prevent that. I guess on that day, we can all say "Today, we are all the American ambassador to Libya."
Are they kidding? There were eight candidates for president in Iran. Each one had to be approved in advance by the Ayatollah. Each one passed muster specifically because he was not a moderate or a reformist. Those men were rejected by the Ayatollah. Anyone who would call a presidential candidate on the ballot in Iran a moderate or a reformist is either an idiot or a propagandist.
If one wanted to get America used to the idea that we will not take steps to stop the Iranian nuclear program after years and years of saying that we would, what better way is there than to convince Americans that Iran is moderating. If Iran is reforming, do we really need to destroy that nation's nuclear capabilities? Of course not!
That, my friends, is why these media propagandists for the administration are reporting nonsense.
When the first post nuclear crisis with Iran erupts -- and it will -- no one will remember what the Times and Yahoo published today. Sadly, though, on that day, millions will be in the cross hairs of nuclear destruction, and they will all wonder why we never did anything to prevent that. I guess on that day, we can all say "Today, we are all the American ambassador to Libya."
No comments:
Post a Comment