The headline in the New York Times that I saw this morning said that a Danish "native son" had attacked both a café and a synagogue in Copenhagen yesterday. That's it. There was no name on the first page and no identification of the gunman except for two references to the fact that he had be born in Denmark.
It is worth noting that the name of the gunman who carried out the terror attacks is Omar Abdel Hamid El-Hussein. I think that even the Times knows that Omar is not a descendant of the Vikings. In fact, the gunman is the child of Arab immigrants and is a Moslem. His despicable terror attack does not indicate that all Moslems are terrorists or even support terrorists, but hiding his identity to follow the Obama line and avoiding mention of his religion and background is crazy.
Have we really reached a point where the New York Times won't even mention the gunman's name in order to be politically correct? At least it confirms that the Times is more of a propaganda outlet than an actual newspaper.
It is worth noting that the name of the gunman who carried out the terror attacks is Omar Abdel Hamid El-Hussein. I think that even the Times knows that Omar is not a descendant of the Vikings. In fact, the gunman is the child of Arab immigrants and is a Moslem. His despicable terror attack does not indicate that all Moslems are terrorists or even support terrorists, but hiding his identity to follow the Obama line and avoiding mention of his religion and background is crazy.
Have we really reached a point where the New York Times won't even mention the gunman's name in order to be politically correct? At least it confirms that the Times is more of a propaganda outlet than an actual newspaper.
No comments:
Post a Comment