We know for a fact that the Canadian branch of the Clinton Foundation received over 1000 large contributions from foreign governments and businesses which total many, many millions of dollars. Those contributions were not disclosed to the public because the Clinton Foundation said they went to its Canadian subsidiary rather than to the foundation itself. Something like twenty million dollars given to the Canadian subsidiary came from people involved in the purchase by Russian interests of roughly 20% of the uranium mining capacity of the entire USA. Hillary Clinton as secretary of state had to approve that Russian purchase of the uranium mines before it could be completed. The contributions to the Canadian branch of the Clinton foundation and the approval by the State Department of the Russian uranium purchase took place a few months apart. The only explanation by Hillary Clinton for the failure to tell the public about the Russian related contributions to her foundation was that they did not have to be disclosed under the law of Canada. There has never been any explanation why all these tens of millions of contributions were given by the people/entities involved in the Russian purchase of the uranium to the Canadian subsidiary rather than to the Clinton foundation itself.
Here's something for which we don't know the facts: According to the New York Times, unnamed investigators are looking into whether or not Paul Manafort, the campaign manager for Donald Trump, received twelve million dollars from the party of the former Ukrainian president. Manafort denies it. He says that his firm did work for that party for which the firm was paid, but that he personally got no such payment mentioned in the Times. Even the Times admits that there is no evidence showing that Manafort got any such payment.
So we have clear evidence of Clinton getting oodles of cash from the Russians when, as secretary of state, she had to make a major decision that affected our national security. At roughly the time the cash arrived, Clinton approved the Russian deal. We have no evidence that Manafort did anything other than provide election services to the party of the former president of the Ukraine. And what is the reaction from the Clinton campaign? They express outrage and say that the payments to Manafort raise the question whether or not Trump has been bought off by the Russians.
It's an amazing thing to watch the Clintons. One would normally think that Hillary's campaign would shy away from discussing the Russians given all the evidence we have of what look like payoffs coming to her through the foundation from those same Russians. Hillary Clinton knows neither shame nor the meaning of honesty and truth. Even without any evidence, she out pushing a phony narrative about how non-existent ties between Trump's campaign manager and a Ukrainian somehow shows that Trump has been bought off by the Russians.
It's an amazing thing, a truly amazing thing. If Clinton were president, there would never be any way to take anything she says at face value. Many people complain about things that Trump says. With Hillary, however, nothing she says means anything. Even if she were to come out and say all the things that Trump said, the media would no doubt tell us to ignore her statements because we all know she is a liar, so she didn't really mean what she said.
Here's something for which we don't know the facts: According to the New York Times, unnamed investigators are looking into whether or not Paul Manafort, the campaign manager for Donald Trump, received twelve million dollars from the party of the former Ukrainian president. Manafort denies it. He says that his firm did work for that party for which the firm was paid, but that he personally got no such payment mentioned in the Times. Even the Times admits that there is no evidence showing that Manafort got any such payment.
So we have clear evidence of Clinton getting oodles of cash from the Russians when, as secretary of state, she had to make a major decision that affected our national security. At roughly the time the cash arrived, Clinton approved the Russian deal. We have no evidence that Manafort did anything other than provide election services to the party of the former president of the Ukraine. And what is the reaction from the Clinton campaign? They express outrage and say that the payments to Manafort raise the question whether or not Trump has been bought off by the Russians.
It's an amazing thing to watch the Clintons. One would normally think that Hillary's campaign would shy away from discussing the Russians given all the evidence we have of what look like payoffs coming to her through the foundation from those same Russians. Hillary Clinton knows neither shame nor the meaning of honesty and truth. Even without any evidence, she out pushing a phony narrative about how non-existent ties between Trump's campaign manager and a Ukrainian somehow shows that Trump has been bought off by the Russians.
It's an amazing thing, a truly amazing thing. If Clinton were president, there would never be any way to take anything she says at face value. Many people complain about things that Trump says. With Hillary, however, nothing she says means anything. Even if she were to come out and say all the things that Trump said, the media would no doubt tell us to ignore her statements because we all know she is a liar, so she didn't really mean what she said.
1 comment:
When you have confidence, you can have a lot of fun. And when you have fun,
you can do amazing things. See the link below for more info.
#amazing
www.ufgop.org
Post a Comment