Over the last twenty years, the BBC has been one of the biggest promoters of Global Warming stories on the planet. Today brings a piece from the BBC that actually acknowledges the lack of warming over the last 15 years. Here's how the BBC puts it:
Since 1998, there has been an unexplained "standstill" in the heating of the Earth's atmosphere.
Writing in Nature Geoscience, the researchers say this will reduce predicted warming in the coming decades.
But long-term, the expected temperature rises will not alter significantly.
Got that? There has not been any statistically significant rise in the Earth's atmosphere for the last 15 years. In the short term that will reduce the warming previously predicted, but in the long run the big temperature increases will still hit. In short, here's how BBC explains this conclusion: the computer models that failed to predict the last fifteen years are still telling us that in the future we will all be a lot warmer.
It is truly amazing to see the Global Warming crowd scrambling to explain why nothing has changed. The truth, however, is that they cannot give such an explanation. Remember, until 1980 or so, the same groups all thought that we were experiencing global cooling. It was not until almost 2000 that Global Warming became accepted dogma. The entire "science" of Global Warming was based upon an increase in carbon dioxide and its heating of the atmosphere due to its being a greenhouse gas. Complex computer simulations were developed that told these researchers that Earth was facing a warming crisis; we had to either reduce carbon dioxide emissions or fry.
A computer simulation is only as good as its ability to predict results. In other words, a simulation of the weather for the next thirty days which predicts heavy snow is not very good if we have normal late Spring weather. A computer model that predicts economic growth at 4.5% is not reliable if we actually go into a recession. That means that the short term results from a computer model are extremely important in evaluating how reliable that model is for the long term.
Right now, we have significant results from the last fifteen years which indicate that there are serious problems with the computer models being used by the Global Warming crowd. Remember, these last fifteen years are not an anomaly; there was not a long period where the computer models worked and a fleeting instance where they went awry. No, since the beginning of the global warming scare, these models have predicted increasing temperatures which have totally failed to materialize. Rational scientists would conclude that the data we have so far clearly indicates that the computer models are fundamentally flawed. In other words, they are a bunch of garbage and we need to start over.
The BBC, of course, cannot bring itself yet to utter that conclusion. We have to be told that warming is still on its way; it is just a bit delayed.
I do not know if we will witness a rise in global temperatures over the next century. I do know, however, the it is not only me here in the dark; the BBC and the entire Global Warming crowd do not have a SCIENTIFICALLY VALID view of what the future temperatures will be. Those bogus computer models are just that: BOGUS COMPUTER MODELS!
Since 1998, there has been an unexplained "standstill" in the heating of the Earth's atmosphere.
Writing in Nature Geoscience, the researchers say this will reduce predicted warming in the coming decades.
But long-term, the expected temperature rises will not alter significantly.
Got that? There has not been any statistically significant rise in the Earth's atmosphere for the last 15 years. In the short term that will reduce the warming previously predicted, but in the long run the big temperature increases will still hit. In short, here's how BBC explains this conclusion: the computer models that failed to predict the last fifteen years are still telling us that in the future we will all be a lot warmer.
It is truly amazing to see the Global Warming crowd scrambling to explain why nothing has changed. The truth, however, is that they cannot give such an explanation. Remember, until 1980 or so, the same groups all thought that we were experiencing global cooling. It was not until almost 2000 that Global Warming became accepted dogma. The entire "science" of Global Warming was based upon an increase in carbon dioxide and its heating of the atmosphere due to its being a greenhouse gas. Complex computer simulations were developed that told these researchers that Earth was facing a warming crisis; we had to either reduce carbon dioxide emissions or fry.
A computer simulation is only as good as its ability to predict results. In other words, a simulation of the weather for the next thirty days which predicts heavy snow is not very good if we have normal late Spring weather. A computer model that predicts economic growth at 4.5% is not reliable if we actually go into a recession. That means that the short term results from a computer model are extremely important in evaluating how reliable that model is for the long term.
Right now, we have significant results from the last fifteen years which indicate that there are serious problems with the computer models being used by the Global Warming crowd. Remember, these last fifteen years are not an anomaly; there was not a long period where the computer models worked and a fleeting instance where they went awry. No, since the beginning of the global warming scare, these models have predicted increasing temperatures which have totally failed to materialize. Rational scientists would conclude that the data we have so far clearly indicates that the computer models are fundamentally flawed. In other words, they are a bunch of garbage and we need to start over.
The BBC, of course, cannot bring itself yet to utter that conclusion. We have to be told that warming is still on its way; it is just a bit delayed.
I do not know if we will witness a rise in global temperatures over the next century. I do know, however, the it is not only me here in the dark; the BBC and the entire Global Warming crowd do not have a SCIENTIFICALLY VALID view of what the future temperatures will be. Those bogus computer models are just that: BOGUS COMPUTER MODELS!
No comments:
Post a Comment