Yesterday, the big political news clearly was Bernie Sanders' big victory in Oregon and the extremely close victory by Hillary Clinton in Kentucky. Particularly since Hillary won Kentucky in 2008 by more than 30 percent over president Obama, the virtual tie this time was a mark of the distaste the Kentucky voters now have towards her. Hillary is going to be the nominee of the Democrats; everyone knows that. Nevertheless, she just cannot seem to beat Sanders in these primaries.
Given that big news, what do you think was the headline on the front page of this morning's New York Times? I'll give you a hint: the Times did not bother to even mention the embarrassing results for Clinton. Nope, the Times ran a headline about Sanders being urged to tone down his supporters' threats. The Times is now pushing the Clinton deception meant to cover up what actually happened in Nevada at the Democrat state convention. I've written about this before, so suffice to say that Clinton forces in the state party apparatus stole some delegates by rigging the count in the voting and then these same Clinton forces adjourned the convention when the Sanders' delegates pushed for a recount. The Sanders' delegates were outraged at this shady and perhaps illegal conduct by the Clintonistas. Since that event, however, the Clinton campaign and media supporters have tried to spin a story in which the Sanders' people misbehaved. That's right. The Clinton crooks stole delegates but the Sanders' people supposedly misbehaved when they objected to the theft.
This sort of behavior ought to warn all Americans what a Hillary Clinton presidency would be like. Everything would be based upon lies. If you have a sampler that your grandmother embroidered that says "Honesty is the best policy", most likely if Hillary wins you will need to hide it. Her motto seems to be "the truth is whatever I say no matter how dishonest."
Given that big news, what do you think was the headline on the front page of this morning's New York Times? I'll give you a hint: the Times did not bother to even mention the embarrassing results for Clinton. Nope, the Times ran a headline about Sanders being urged to tone down his supporters' threats. The Times is now pushing the Clinton deception meant to cover up what actually happened in Nevada at the Democrat state convention. I've written about this before, so suffice to say that Clinton forces in the state party apparatus stole some delegates by rigging the count in the voting and then these same Clinton forces adjourned the convention when the Sanders' delegates pushed for a recount. The Sanders' delegates were outraged at this shady and perhaps illegal conduct by the Clintonistas. Since that event, however, the Clinton campaign and media supporters have tried to spin a story in which the Sanders' people misbehaved. That's right. The Clinton crooks stole delegates but the Sanders' people supposedly misbehaved when they objected to the theft.
This sort of behavior ought to warn all Americans what a Hillary Clinton presidency would be like. Everything would be based upon lies. If you have a sampler that your grandmother embroidered that says "Honesty is the best policy", most likely if Hillary wins you will need to hide it. Her motto seems to be "the truth is whatever I say no matter how dishonest."
No comments:
Post a Comment