The UK Daily Mail is reporting this morning that the government of Saudi Arabia sent a written warning to the United States Department of Homeland Security in 2012 stating that Tamarlan Tsarnaev and three others were jihadists and that they were planning an explosive attack on a major American city.
Let that sink in for a moment. If this is true, it means that the federal government was warned by a foreign ally that Tsarnaev was planning to do exactly what he did at the Boston Marathon. I say "if that is true", because it is hard for me to understand how Homeland Security could receive such a warning and ignore it. Even a minimal follow through after receipt of the warning would have resulted in a picture of Tsarnaev landing in the government's data base of potential terror suspects. But we know that no such photos ever made it into the database because the feds had to release pictures of the Tsarnaev brothers in hopes of having the public identify them.
If this is true (I say again), then the deaths and maimings in Boston were completely preventable if the feds had just done their jobs. Can it be that the DHS has so taken to hearth the message of the Obamacrats that the war on terror is over, that DHS now just ignores warnings of new terror attacks? If this is true, does it explain why president Obama and the rest of his administration have gone through such contortions to say that the Tsarnaevs were so called lone wolves who got no help from other terrorists? If this is true, does it explain the rush to give Miranda warninds to Dzhokhar Tsarnaev; was that surprise move a plan to prevent the little brother from revealing that there was a network of assistance that included the other three men about whom the Saudis warned us?
This is really big stuff. We already know that the feds ignored the warnings of the Russians about Tsarnaev. The FBI claims that it followed up on the warnings from Moscow, but the evidence is clear that it did not. We also heard that the Russian warning was vague, that it was viewed as over the top because Tsarnaev was Chechen, and other put downs of the validity of the warning. But this is a written warning from our allies the Saudis. This is a warning from a country that reportedly refused entry to Tsarnaev on the basis of his terrorist ties. This is really big stuff.
Are we actually being protected by the federal government? It is a question for which we really need to know the answer.
Let that sink in for a moment. If this is true, it means that the federal government was warned by a foreign ally that Tsarnaev was planning to do exactly what he did at the Boston Marathon. I say "if that is true", because it is hard for me to understand how Homeland Security could receive such a warning and ignore it. Even a minimal follow through after receipt of the warning would have resulted in a picture of Tsarnaev landing in the government's data base of potential terror suspects. But we know that no such photos ever made it into the database because the feds had to release pictures of the Tsarnaev brothers in hopes of having the public identify them.
If this is true (I say again), then the deaths and maimings in Boston were completely preventable if the feds had just done their jobs. Can it be that the DHS has so taken to hearth the message of the Obamacrats that the war on terror is over, that DHS now just ignores warnings of new terror attacks? If this is true, does it explain why president Obama and the rest of his administration have gone through such contortions to say that the Tsarnaevs were so called lone wolves who got no help from other terrorists? If this is true, does it explain the rush to give Miranda warninds to Dzhokhar Tsarnaev; was that surprise move a plan to prevent the little brother from revealing that there was a network of assistance that included the other three men about whom the Saudis warned us?
This is really big stuff. We already know that the feds ignored the warnings of the Russians about Tsarnaev. The FBI claims that it followed up on the warnings from Moscow, but the evidence is clear that it did not. We also heard that the Russian warning was vague, that it was viewed as over the top because Tsarnaev was Chechen, and other put downs of the validity of the warning. But this is a written warning from our allies the Saudis. This is a warning from a country that reportedly refused entry to Tsarnaev on the basis of his terrorist ties. This is really big stuff.
Are we actually being protected by the federal government? It is a question for which we really need to know the answer.
No comments:
Post a Comment