David Brock (remember him?) is coming out with a book attacking the New York Times for its relentlessly anti-Clinton coverage of the news. Hard to imagine, don't you think? We're supposed to believe that the Times, the liberal news nirvana, is actually biased against Hillary Clinton. That's the Times which endorsed Hillary over Obama in 2008 that's supposed to have a long standing vendetta against Hillary. It's hysterical.
For many years, one of the favorite Clinton tactics is to create some "vast right wing conspiracy" that's after them. Hillary first told us of that cabal of right wingers when she claimed that they had "created" the phony story about Monica Lewinsky in an effort to discredit Bill. That ought to tell you all you need to know about the accuracy of these claims. Bill had sex with Monica; Hillary knew; Hillary then called the story false and blamed the vast rightwing conspiracy. Lately, we've had Hillary set up a private unsecured email system. Hillary helped set up a "foundation" that acts as a slush fund for the Clintons. Hillary sent and received classified information on her unsecured email system. The Times and many other news outlets reported on this story. That means that the Times must be out to get Hillary. Who would doubt that.
I don't often defend the New York Times on this site. Too often the Times displays bias against conservatives. But the idea of the Times running a vendetta against Hillary is....well...just too funny. Indeed, it is a good indicator of just how desperate the Clinton camp is becoming.
For many years, one of the favorite Clinton tactics is to create some "vast right wing conspiracy" that's after them. Hillary first told us of that cabal of right wingers when she claimed that they had "created" the phony story about Monica Lewinsky in an effort to discredit Bill. That ought to tell you all you need to know about the accuracy of these claims. Bill had sex with Monica; Hillary knew; Hillary then called the story false and blamed the vast rightwing conspiracy. Lately, we've had Hillary set up a private unsecured email system. Hillary helped set up a "foundation" that acts as a slush fund for the Clintons. Hillary sent and received classified information on her unsecured email system. The Times and many other news outlets reported on this story. That means that the Times must be out to get Hillary. Who would doubt that.
I don't often defend the New York Times on this site. Too often the Times displays bias against conservatives. But the idea of the Times running a vendetta against Hillary is....well...just too funny. Indeed, it is a good indicator of just how desperate the Clinton camp is becoming.
No comments:
Post a Comment