South Carolina authorities have a man in custody for starting fires in two homes owned by the governor of that state and trying but failing to start a fire in a third home.
Have we really gotten to the point in this country where someone thinks that it is a valid means of protest to destroy homes just because the owner (not the occupant) is the governor of the state? I know this is premature. We don't know the motive for the arson yet, but it sure seems that it would be an amazing coincidence for three homes to be targeted for arson with all three belonging to the governor.
Have we really gotten to the point in this country where someone thinks that it is a valid means of protest to destroy homes just because the owner (not the occupant) is the governor of the state? I know this is premature. We don't know the motive for the arson yet, but it sure seems that it would be an amazing coincidence for three homes to be targeted for arson with all three belonging to the governor.
No comments:
Post a Comment